Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Obama: I can't do 'Jedi mind meld' - Politico (blog)

Written By Unknown on Sabtu, 02 Maret 2013 | 16.14

President Barack Obama, seeking to illustrate Friday that he has done all he can to avert sequester cuts, invoked a few memorable analogies.

First there was one from the movie "Star Wars" -- although he mixed up his space dramas a bit.

"I know that this has been some of the conventional wisdom that's been floating around Washington: That somehow, even though most people agree that I'm being reasonable, that most people agree that I'm presenting a fair deal --  the fact that they don't take it, means that I should somehow do a Jedi mindmeld with these folks and convince them to do what's right," he said. "Well, they're elected. We have a constitutional system of government."

The "mind meld" actually comes from "Star Trek," while Jedis are from "Star Wars" and what they did was a "mind trick."

(PHOTOS: Sequestration: Final day)

Then there was the "secret sauce."

"Ultimately, it's a choice they make. And this idea that somehow there's a secret formula or secret sauce to get Speaker Boehner or Mitch McConnell to say, 'You know what, Mr. President, You're right. We should close tax loopholes for the well-off and well-connected in exchange for some serious entitlement reform and spending cuts to programs we don't need.'

"You know, I think if there was a secret way to do that, I would have tried it, I would have done it."

(PHOTOS: How sequestration could affect you)

Read more about: Sequestration


16.14 | 0 komentar | Read More

Samsung's $1B Bill in Apple Case Reduced by $450M - ABC News

A federal judge on Friday slashed nearly half of the $1 billion damage award a jury ordered Samsung Electronics to pay Apple Inc. after a high-profile trial over the rights to the design and technology running some of the world's most popular smartphones and tablet computers.

U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh lowered the damages awarded to Apple Inc. by $450.5 million for 14 Samsung products including some products in its hot-selling Galaxy lineup, saying jurors had not properly followed her instruction in calculating some of the damages.

She also concluded that mistakes had been made in determining when Apple had first notified Samsung about the alleged violations of patents for its trend-setting iPhone and IPad.

Koh ordered a new trial to recalculate damages for those products.

"We are pleased that the court decided to strike $450,514,650 from the jury's award," Samsung spokeswoman Lauren Restuccia said. "Samsung intends to seek further review as to the remaining award."

Apple declined to comment on the Koh's ruling.

The ruling reduced Samsung Electronics' bill to just under $599 million. The judge said the tab will probably increase after the appeals of both companies are resolved.

Apple is seeking more damages and Samsung a complete dismissal of the case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the Washington, D.C.-based court that handles all patent appeals. The new trial to recalculate the damages could also increase the award.

AP

This undated image provided by Samsung on Saturday, Feb. 23, 2013 shows the Samsung GALAXY Note 8 with a stylus. Samsung Electronics is beefing up its tablet range with a competitor to Apple's iPad Mini that sports a pen for writing on the screen. The Korean company announced on Sunday, Feb. 24, 2013 in Barcelona, Spain that the Galaxy Note 8.0 will have an 8-inch screen, putting it very close in size to the Apple's tablet. (AP Photo/Samsung) Close

Still, the ruling was the second significant setback in Koh's courtroom since the headline grabbing verdict was announced.

In December, Koh refused to order a sales ban on the products the jury found infringed Apple's patents. She said Apple failed to prove the purloined technology is what drove consumers to buy a Samsung product instead of an Apple iPhone or iPad. Samsung says that it is continues to sell only three of the two dozen products found to have infringed Apple's patents.

After a three-week trial closely followed in Silicon Valley, the jury decided that Samsung ripped off the trailblazing technology and sleek designs used by Apple to create its revolutionary iPhone and iPad. Jurors ordered Samsung to pay Apple $1.05 billion.

Apple filed another lawsuit last year accusing Samsung's newer line of products of continuing to use technology controlled by Apple. Koh has scheduled trial in that case for early next year. She has implored both companies on several occasions to settle their difference with little success.

Apple filed its patent infringement lawsuit in April 2011 and engaged legions of the country's highest-paid patent lawyers to demand $2.5 billion from its top smartphone competitor. Samsung Electronics Co. fired back with its own lawsuit seeking $399 million.

The jury found that several Samsung products illegally used such Apple creations as the "bounce-back" feature when a user scrolls to an end image, and the ability to zoom text with a tap of a finger.

Samsung has mounted an aggressive post-trial attack on the verdict, raising a number of legal issues that allege the South Korean company was treated unfairly in a federal courtroom a dozen miles from Apple's Cupertino headquarters. Samsung alleges that some of Apple's patents shouldn't have been awarded in the first place and that the jury made mistakes in calculating the damage award.

Samsung has emerged as one of Apple's biggest rivals and has overtaken it as the leading smartphone maker. Samsung's Galaxy line of phones run on Android, a mobile operating system that Google Inc. has given out for free to Samsung and other phone makers.

Apple and Samsung have filed similar lawsuits in eight other countries, including South Korea, Germany, Japan, Italy, the Netherlands, Britain, France and Australia.


16.14 | 0 komentar | Read More

Obama Administration Joins Legal Fight Against California Gay Marriage Ban - ABC News

The Department of Justice filed a brief today in the case of a controversial California ballot initiative that defines marriage as between one man and one woman, asking the Supreme Court to affirm a lower court decision that struck down the measure, known as Proposition 8.

The brief marked the first time that the Obama administration has come out in court against Prop 8 and the first time it has argued against state gay marriage ban before the Supreme Court.

The administration's argument also could reverberate beyond California. If the Supreme Court accepts the arguments in the brief, it could lay the groundwork toward undermining laws against gay marriage in several other states.

"The exclusion of gay and lesbian couples from marriage does not substantially further any important governmental interest. Proposition 8 thus violates equal protection," wrote Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr. in a "friend of the court" brief filed in favor of gay and lesbian couples challenging Prop 8.

Now that it has filed a Supreme Court amicus brief, the Obama administration most likely will be granted time to actually argue its position in front of the justices. When the government files an amicus brief in an important case, it is normally granted time to argue.

A statement on behalf of ProtectMarriage.com, the proponent of Prop 8, described the Obama administration's decision to weigh in both "unprecedented" and "hardly surprising, but nevertheless disturbing."

"In his first term as president, Obama clearly stated that Americans can choose a special designation of marriage between man and woman, and that supporters of traditional marriage can hold that position without animus," said the statement by Andy Pugno, general counsel for ProtectMarriage.com. "He later remarked that it would be a 'mistake' to make the debate over redefining marriage into a federal issue.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

"Yet today," the statement added, "by stating that the traditional definition of marriage is rooted only in irrational prejudice, the president has impugned the motives and actions of millions of Californians and turned his back on society's long-standing interest in both mothers and fathers raising the next generation."

Thomas Peters, communications director for the National Organization for Marriage, another gay marriage opponent, invoked California's voters in saying the group expected the court to uphold the law.

"NOM expects the Supreme Court to exonerate the votes of over 7 million Californians to protect marriage," said Peters. "The president is clearly fulfilling a campaign promise to wealthy gay marriage donors. There is no right to redefine marriage in our Constitution."

However, referring to proponents of the voter-approved measure who are defending it in court, Verrilli wrote, "Petitioners contend that Proposition 8 serves an interest in returning the issue of marriage to the democratic process, but use of a voter initiative to promote democratic self-governance cannot save a law like Proposition 8 that would otherwise violate equal protection."

In Depth: Obama's Prop 8 Decision

The Obama administration brief noted that California extends all of the rights and responsibilities of marriage to gay and lesbians, but forbids them the designation of "marriage."

That circumstance "particularly undermines the justifications for Proposition 8," Verrilli wrote.

While the brief fell short of calling for a fundamental right to marriage under the Constitution, it suggested that if the court were to agree with the administration's position, gay marriage laws in seven other states could be in jeopardy. Those states are Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon and Rhode Island.

"The brief pays closest attention to California and the other seven states that grant same-sex couples all the rights and responsibilities of marriage but insist on denying them the favored name," said Jane S. Schacter, a professor at Stanford Law School. "But it advocates that the court adopt a much tougher, more skeptical approach to any state law that denies same-sex couples the right to marry.


16.14 | 0 komentar | Read More

Florida Man Swallowed by Sinkhole: Conditions Too Unstable to Approach - ABC News

A sinkhole that swallowed a Florida man when it collapsed the bedroom portion of his home overnight is "extremely unstable," expected to grow bigger and too dangerous for rescuers to approach, Hillsborough County officials said.

"Until we know where it's safe to bring the equipment, we really are just handicapped and paralyzed and can't really do a whole lot more than sit and wait," Hillsborough County Fire Chief Ron Rogers told reporters this evening. "It's a tough situation; it's even tougher for the family."

The hole that pulled in Jeff Bush, 36, opened up at around 11 p.m. Thursday night in Seffner, Fla., authorities said.

"[Family members] heard a sound that they described as a car crash emanating from the bedroom in the back of the house," Rogers said at an earlier news conference.

The family rushed into the room where Bush was sleeping, according to ABC News' Tampa affiliate WFTS-TV.

"All they could see was part of a mattress sticking out of the hole. Essentially, the floor of the room had opened up," Rogers said.

MORE: How Sinkholes Can Develop

Sinkhole Victim's Brother: 'I Know in My Heart He's Dead' Watch Video
Louisiana Sinkhole Raises Fears of Expansion Watch Video

The hole remained 20 to 30 feet wide this evening, officials said, but it had progressively deepened beyond the 20 feet seen earlier today.

"The soil cannot hold the slope that it is right now," said Larry Madrid, president of Madrid Engineering Group, a sinkhole expert called in by the county.

Engineers feared a further sudden collapse because the house sat on fluid, sandy soil, and they remained uncertain about where the unstable area ended.

"[Another collapse] could happen now, it could happen days from now," Madrid said. "It could happen slowly, it could happen quickly."

The partially collapsed house and two neighboring houses have been evacuated.

"As items fall in from the house, [they] get pulled down in," said Bill Bracken, an engineer working with Hillsborough County Search and Rescue.

"Given the size of the hole, I cannot tell you why [the whole house] hasn't collapsed yet," he said.

The instability meant rescuers were unable to continue searching for Jeff Bush within the house.

"As I told the family earlier, the only thing that would be worse than what they're feeling now for their loss would be to experience additional human loss," Hillsborough County Administrator Mike Merrill said this evening. "That's the dilemma and the dilemma is a very painful dilemma for everyone."

"This is not your typical sinkhole," he added. "This is a chasm that covers a great distance. They still have not been able to find the boundaries of the underground chasm."

After the initial collapse, Jeff Bush's brother Jeremy jumped into the sinkhole and tried to rescue him, only to need rescuing himself.

"I jumped in the hole and was trying to dig him out, but I couldn't find him," Jeremy Bush tearfully told WFTS. "I thought I could hear him hollering for me to help him.

"I didn't see any part of him when I went in there," he said. "All I seen was his bed and I told my father-in-law to grab a shovel so I could start digging, and I just started digging and started digging, and the cops showed up and pulled me out of the hole and said the floor was still falling in."

A first responder "heroically" jumped in and rescued Jeremy Bush, Rogers said.

"I went to the bedroom and saw the sinkhole taking the entire bedroom," Hillsborough County Deputy Douglas Duvall said in a video taken and posted by the sheriff's office online.


16.14 | 0 komentar | Read More

Spending cuts now in place, Obama and congressional Republicans brace for ... - Washington Post

WASHINGTON — Severe spending cuts now the law of the land, President Barack Obama and congressional Republicans refused Saturday to concede any culpability for failing to stave off what both parties acknowledged was a foolhardy way to slash $85 billion in federal spending.

The still-fragile economy braced itself for the gradual but potentially grave impact of the across-the-board cuts, which took effect Friday night at the stroke of Obama's pen. Hours earlier, he and congressional leaders emerged from a White House meeting no closer to an agreement.

Even as they pledged a renewed effort to retroactively undo the spending cuts, both parties said the blame rests squarely on the other for any damage the cuts might inflict. There were no indications that either side was wavering from entrenched positions that for weeks had prevented progress on a deal to find a way out: Republicans refusing any deal with more tax revenue and Democrats snubbing any deal without it.

"None of this is necessary," Obama said in his weekly radio and Internet address Saturday. "It's happening because Republicans in Congress chose this outcome over closing a single wasteful tax loophole that helps reduce the deficit."

The president said the cuts would cause "a ripple effect across the economy" that would worsen the longer they stay in place, eventually costing more than 750,000 jobs and disrupting the lives of middle-class families.

In the Republican-controlled House, GOP lawmakers washed their hands of the mess, arguing that bills they passed in the last Congress to avert the cuts absolved them of any responsibility. Those bills passed with little to no Democratic support and were never taken up by the Senate.

"We've done the work and shown that these choices can be made in a responsible, thoughtful way," said Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington in the GOP address.

Obama was holding out hope that as Americans start feeling the effects of the sequester — the term used for the automatic spending cuts — public pressure will force lawmakers back to the table. Ever wary that such fiscal fiascos could jeopardize the rest of his second-term agenda, Obama vowed in his weekly address to keep pushing reforms on immigration, preschool, gun violence and transportation.

But attention was already turning to the next major budget hurdles, with less than a month to negotiate a plan to fund the government beyond March 27 and a debt-ceiling clash coming in May.

Hopes that a measure to undo the spending cuts could be wrapped into a March deal to keep the government running dimmed Friday when both Obama and House Speaker John Boehner said they'd prefer to keep the two issues separate.

"I'm hopeful that we won't have to deal with the threat of a government shutdown while we're dealing with the sequester at the same time," Boehner said.

Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


16.14 | 0 komentar | Read More

'Only thing we want is weapons' Photo: Reuters - Ynetnews

The head of Syria's rebels said Friday that the food and medical supplies the United States plans to give his fighters for the first time won't bring them any closer to defeating President Bashar Assad 's forces in the country's civil war.

"We don't want food and drink, and we don't want bandages. When we're wounded, we want to die. The only thing we want is weapons," Gen. Salim Idris, chief of staff of the opposition's Supreme Military Council, told The Associated Press by telephone.

Related stories:

The former brigadier in Assad's army warned that the world's failure to provide heavier arms is only prolonging the nearly 2-year-old uprising that has killed an estimated 70,000 people.

In what was described as a significant policy shift, the Obama administration said Thursday it was giving an additional $60 million in assistance to Syria's political opposition and said it would, for the first time, provide non-lethal aid directly to rebels battling to topple Assad.


מורדים בסוריה. הלחימה נמשכת שנתיים (צילום: רויטרס)

Rebels in Syria (Photo: Reuters)

The move was announced by US Secretary of State John Kerry at an international conference on Syria in Rome. In the coming days, several European nations are expected to take similar steps in working with the military wing of the opposition to increase pressure on Assad to step down and pave the way for a democratic transition.

But the frustration expressed by Idris is shared by most of his colleagues in the Syrian opposition, as well as by scores of rebels fighting in Syria. They feel abandoned by the outside world while the Assad regime pounds them with artillery and bombs.

The main rebel units, known together as the Free Syrian Army, regrouped in December under a unified, Western-backed command headed by Idris and called the Supreme Military Council, following promises of more military assistance once a central council was in place. Despite those pledges, opposition members say very little has been delivered in terms of financial aid, and more importantly, in weapons and ammunition.

The international community remains reluctant to send weapons, fearing they may fall into the hands of extremists increasingly gaining ground among the rebels.

Mouaz al-Khatib, the leader of the Syrian opposition coalition, has lamented the West's focus on the presence of Islamic militants among the fighters. In a forceful speech Thursday to the Rome conference, he said the media reports give "more attention to the length of fighters' beards than to the (regime's) massacres."

Some Syrians expressed their disappointment on social media websites. One showed a photo of Kerry carrying a toy gun as a gift for the rebels. Another depicted a three-wheeled cart, of the kind usually used by farmers, with the words: "The first of the nonlethal weapons has arrived."

Idris, a 55-year-old who studied in Germany and taught electronics at a Syrian military college before defecting in July, said the modest package of aid — consisting of an undetermined amount of food rations and medical supplies — will not help them win against Assad's forces who regularly use warplanes to pound rebel strongholds.

"We need anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles to stop Bashar Assad's criminal, murderous regime from annihilating the Syrian people," he said. "The whole world knows what we need, and yet they watch as the Syrian people are slaughtered."

Still, he said he hoped that the promised aid is delivered, which would provide some relief to the civilians caught in the fighting.

Russia, meanwhile, sharply criticized the decision by Western powers to boost support for Syrian opposition forces, saying the promised assistance would only intensify the conflict. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said the moves announced in Rome "encourage extremists to seize power by force."

Russia is a close ally of Syria that has continued to supply arms to Assad's regime as well as shielding the country from UN Security Council sanctions.

Idris denied media reports that the rebels have recently received arms shipments and said his troops were suffering from "severe shortages" in weapons and ammunitions.

Croatia's president said Friday his country will withdraw about 100 peacekeeping troops from the Syria-Israel border after reports that Syrian rebels have been armed with Croatian weapons. The Croatian government fears its troops could become targets for Syrian government soldiers fighting the rebels.

Croatian officials have also denied reports by local media and The New York Times that arms, including machine guns, rifles and anti-tank grenades used in the Balkan wars in the 1990s have recently been sent to the Syrian rebels.

Croatian Prime Minister Zoran Milanovic said despite the official denials, "everyone has read those reports, and our soldiers are no longer safe."

Fierce clashes continued in northern Syria between government forces and rebels attacking a police academy near Aleppo, the country's largest city and commercial hub.

Rebels backed by captured tanks have been trying to storm the police academy outside the city since launching a new offensive last week. Activists say the academy, which has become a key front in the fight for Aleppo, has been turned into a military base used to shell rebel-held neighborhoods in the city and surrounding countryside.

 

  • Receive Ynetnews updates directly to your desktop

16.13 | 0 komentar | Read More

Federal budget cuts free illegal immigrants from detention - CBS News

Written By Unknown on Kamis, 28 Februari 2013 | 16.14

(CBS News) -- The federal budget cuts expected to take effect this Friday are not simple. For example, hundreds of illegal immigrants are being released from detention because the administration says it can't afford to keep them.

Until recently, Fredi Alcazar was one of those detained. An illegal immigrant from Mexico, Alcazar spent a month in jail after a traffic stop near Atlanta last December. He now wears an electronic monitoring band on his ankle. The device lets immigration officials know where he is at all times.

(watch: Releasing illegal immigrants over budget cuts, below)

Alcazar was released unexpectedly in January.

"I was surprised they released me," Alcazar recalled. "They didn't say anything."

Officials at Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would not tell CBS exactly how many detainees they released ahead of for Friday's automatic budget cuts. They also declined to say where or when the releases occurred.

Those let go, like Fredi Alcazar, are required to wear electronic tracking devices, regularly call immigration officials or visit ICE offices.

"We started getting calls all of a sudden they had been released," said immigration advocate Dulce Guerrero. "We were very much in shock."

The early release of detainees was a surprise to Guerrero.

Boehner release of detained immigrants "outrageous"
Sequestration, immigration and guns: View from the states
Controversial new licenses for illegal immigrants to be issued in North Carolina
Complete Coverage: The Sequester

"These folks are no criminals," she said. "These folks in there are moms, dads, students, community members who are in there for no license, for a broken tail light."

But some members of Congress are demanding ICE provide information on each detainee's case.

"When you release these people and expect them to show up at a court proceeding at a later date, we found before that 90 percent of them don't show up," said Congressman Michael McCaul, chair of the House Homeland Security Committee.

Besides Georgia, CBS did learn that many releases were in Arizona, California and Florida. Immigration advocates said that "supervised release" costs about $14 a day compared to about $160 a day to keep detainees in jail.
16.14 | 0 komentar | Read More

Bloomberg Goes to Washington to Push Gun Laws, but Senate Has Other Ideas - New York Times

WASHINGTON — Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York met separately on Wednesday with Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and several senators, a day after his campaign for tougher gun laws was newly fortified by the victory of his preferred candidate in a special Congressional primary election in Chicago where he had spent more than $2 million.

Meanwhile, a Senate hearing that included witnesses from the shooting in Newtown, Conn., aired exchanges both poignant and petulant. Questions by Republican senators underscored just how difficult a path such gun-control legislation faces despite the national horror over massacres like the one in December at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

While much of Washington seemed preoccupied by the partisan budget impasse and countdown to the automatic spending cuts scheduled to begin Friday, the maneuvering over the issue of gun violence was indicative of proponents' efforts to keep it alive even as many fear that the sense of urgency after the Newtown shootings is waning. Speaking to reporters on leaving his White House meeting with Mr. Biden, Mr. Bloomberg took some credit for the victory by Robin Kelly, the Cook County chief administrative officer, in Tuesday's crowded Democratic primary race for the House seat vacated by Jesse L. Jackson Jr.

The mayor's "super PAC" independently funneled $2.2 million into the campaign on advertisements that extolled Ms. Kelly and her support for national gun legislation and criticized a leading rival who opposed banning assault weapons and was endorsed by the National Rifle Association. Victory in the Democratic primary is considered tantamount to election in the heavily Democratic House district. The election is next month.

Mr. Bloomberg told the reporters that the Kelly primary victory was a sign of what can happen when the public stands up to the gun lobby. Yet analysts in both parties and on both sides of the gun issue cautioned against reading too much into the outcome in a big-city, heavily black district where firearms restrictions generally are popular.

Mr. Biden, who since the Newtown massacre has been leading the Obama administration's push for legislation, has met with Mr. Bloomberg several times to coordinate that effort. The mayor also met Wednesday with the Senate majority leader, Senator Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, who controls that body's schedule, and with three Republican senators whose willingness to compromise is crucial to any gun legislation's success: Susan Collins of Maine, Mark Steven Kirk of Illinois, both moderates, and John McCain of Arizona.

John Feinblatt, the mayor's chief policy adviser, said Mr. Bloomberg "talked about his concern that the Senate listen to the American people, who clearly want something done about gun violence."

The Senate Judiciary Committee's hearing was on a bill, sponsored by Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, to ban certain semiautomatic weapons like the one used in Newtown.

Neil Heslin, whose 6-year-old son, Jesse, was killed at Sandy Hook, wept as he recalled his last minutes with Jesse that morning and then how he waited that night in a nearby firehouse until 1 a.m. for confirmation that his son was among the dead.

Holding a framed portrait of himself and his son, Mr. Heslin told how he and Jesse had stopped before school at a deli, where Jesse ordered his favorite breakfast: sausage, egg and cheese on a hard roll, and hot chocolate — his "coffee," like Dad drank. The clock at Sandy Hook Elementary read 9:04 a.m. when he dropped Jesse off, Mr. Heslin said, and his son "hugged me and held me, and I can still feel that hug and that pat on the back."

"He said, 'Everything is going to be O.K., Dad. It's all going to be O.K.,' "Mr. Heslin continued. "And it wasn't O.K. I have to go home at night to an empty house without my son."

Dr. William Begg, the physician on duty in the emergency room where the Newtown victims were brought, played a video of two bullets being fired into beige, gelatinous material resembling flesh. One was from a handgun, the other from an AR-15, a popular style of assault rifle. The footage revealed far more tearing and damage from the AR-15.

Dr. Begg, a box of tissues at his side on the witness table, choked up as he read statistics about the frequency of mass shootings in the United States compared with the rest of the world. "This is a tipping point, and this is a public health issue," he told the senators. "Please make the right decision."

But in a tense back-and-forth, Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, told another witness, Edward A. Flynn, Milwaukee's chief of police, that the problem was not guns, but those who wielded them.

"I own an AR-15," Mr. Graham said. "And you may not understand why I want to own an AR-15, and I may not understand what movies you want to watch. But we're talking about trying to solve a problem that has, as its central core, that the people who are committing these crimes should never have any gun or one bullet."


16.14 | 0 komentar | Read More

Senate Democrats and GOP to stage votes on rival plans to address automatic ... - Washington Post

WASHINGTON — Across-the-board spending cuts all but certain, Republicans and Democrats in the Senate are staging a politically charged showdown designed to avoid public blame for any resulting inconvenience or disruption in government services.

The two parties drafted alternative measures to replace the cuts, but officials conceded in advance the rival measures were doomed.

At the White House, President Barack Obama invited congressional leaders to discuss the issue with him on Friday — deadline day for averting the cuts, which would slash $85 billion from the military and domestic programs alike.

Democrats controlling the Senate are pushing a $110 billion plan that would block the cuts through the end of the year. They would carve 5 percent from domestic agencies and 8 percent from the Pentagon but would leave several major programs alone, including Social Security, Medicaid and food stamps, while limiting the cuts to Medicare to a 2 percent reduction to health care providers like doctors and hospitals.

The Democratic plan proposes $27.5 billion in future-year cuts in defense spending, elimination of a program of direct payments to certain farmers, and a minimum tax rate on income exceeding $1 million as the main elements of an alternative to the immediate and bruising automatic cuts, known in Washington-speak as a "sequester."

Republicans were sure to kill the Democratic alternative with a filibuster. They were poised to offer an alternative of their own that would give Obama the authority to propose a rewrite to the 2013 budget to redistribute the cuts. Obama would be unable to cut defense by more than the $43 billion reduction that the Pentagon faces and would be unable to raise taxes to undo the cuts.

The idea is that money could be transferred from lower-priority accounts to accounts funding air traffic control or meat inspection. The White House says such moves would offer only slight relief, but they could take pressure off Congress to address the sequester.

Democrats are sure to vote the GOP measure down. Both the House and the Senate are set to send their members home Thursday afternoon, even as the deadline to avoid the cuts looms the next day. Though bound to fail, the rival votes will allow both sides to claim they tried to address the cuts even as they leave them in place and exit Washington for a long weekend.

Obama on Wednesday summoned top congressional leaders for a White House meeting on Friday. Given longstanding, intractable differences over Obama's insistence that new tax revenues help replace the cuts, the meeting was not expected to produce a breakthrough.

Another topic for Friday's discussion is how to avoid Washington's next crisis, which threatens a government shutdown after March 27, when a six-month spending bill enacted last year expires.

Republicans are planning for a vote next week on a bill to fund the day-to-day operations of the government through the Sept. 30 end of the 2013 fiscal year, while keeping in place the $85 billion in automatic cuts.


16.14 | 0 komentar | Read More

Voting rights are still vulnerable - Philadelphia Inquirer

Half a century after Congress passed landmark civil-rights legislation, how far should the federal government go to protect the hard-won voting rights of once-disenfranchised minorities? That's the question before the U.S. Supreme Court after Wednesday's arguments on the latest challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965. While times have changed, the court should heed the continued need for voting protections.
The justices are considering a challenge to the section of the law that requires certain voting districts to get clearance from the U.S. Justice Department before they can change election rules or procedures. The provision applies to all or part of 16 states with a history of voter discrimination - mostly in the South, with its long history of voting laws designed to keep minorities out of polling places. Congress has repeatedly renewed the Voting Rights Act, most recently in 2006, when it extended the clearance requirement for 25 years.

Three years ago, the high court considered the same issue but ultimately sidestepped what Chief Justice John Roberts called a "difficult constitutional question." That's not likely to happen this time.

In the latest challenge, from Shelby County, Ala., state and county officials argue that in light of significant progress on voting rights, they should no longer be subject to the same level of federal oversight.

Indeed, the days of Bull Connor and church bombings are long gone, and race relations are not what they were 50 years ago. African Americans and other racial minorities voted in record numbers last year, helping to propel President Obama to a second term.

But that doesn't mean it's time to put away an effective tool for preventing voter discrimination. The 2012 election also provided ample evidence that such protections are still needed. The Voting Rights Act played a role in successful efforts to prevent several states, including Pennsylvania, from implementing voter-identification laws that were expected to discourage minorities from showing up at the polls.

From the News Desk

opinion: container - media promo - 173678181: autoplay - OFF: continuous - ON: tpltID - 1897076382001: playlistID - 20784181001

This content requires the Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Get Flash

Stay Connected

Get the latest Philly.com Daily Headlines newsletter delivered to your email. Sign up now!

And despite those efforts, there were still cases like that of the 102-year-old Florida woman who had to wait more than three hours to cast her ballot. Her state curtailed early voting, causing long lines at polling places.

Rather than striking down the Voting Rights Act's clearance requirement, the justices should provide guidance on updating the law. Congress could, for example, change the formula that determines which jurisdictions are covered and allow reduced oversight of those with strong records. The best outcome would be a ruling that gives lawmakers another opportunity to decide how to protect voters' constitutional rights fairly.


16.14 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger